Method Process Safety
support@methodprosafe.com

Hazard Study Training CourseTestimonials

Delegate rating of this course

Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 0.0%
September 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 100.0%
September 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 95.0%
September 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 95.0%
September 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 95.0%
September 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 95.3%
September 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 96.1%
June 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 100.0%
June 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 95.0%
June 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 93.3%
June 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 95.0%
June 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 93.0%
June 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 89.2%
June 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 89.3%
June 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 88.8%
Edinburgh May 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.0%
Edinburgh May 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 95.0%
Edinburgh May 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 96.7%
Edinburgh May 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 97.5%
Edinburgh May 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 98.0%
Edinburgh May 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 96.7%
March 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 100.0%
March 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 97.5%
March 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 98.3%
March 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 97.5%
March 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 97.0%
March 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 97.5%
March 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 97.9%
March 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 98.1%
January 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 85.0%
January 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 92.0%
January 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 88.0%
January 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 88.5%
January 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.4%
January 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 88.7%
January 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 88.9%
January 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 89.6%
January 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 89.7%
Leeds December 2023 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.0%
Leeds December 2023 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 92.5%
Leeds December 2023 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.0%
Leeds December 2023 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.0%
Leeds December 2023 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 89.0%
Handforth July 2023 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.0%
Handforth July 2023 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 95.0%
Handforth July 2023 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 96.3%
Handforth July 2023 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 94.8%
Stockport November 2022 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.0%
Stockport November 2022 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.0%
Stockport November 2022 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 91.7%
Stockport November 2022 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 91.3%
Stockport November 2022 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 91.0%
Stockport November 2022 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.8%
Bradford-on-Avon July 2022 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 80.0%
Bradford-on-Avon July 2022 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 82.0%
Bradford-on-Avon July 2022 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 86.3%
Bradford-on-Avon July 2022 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 87.3%
Bradford-on-Avon July 2022 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 87.8%
Bradford-on-Avon July 2022 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 88.2%
Bradford-on-Avon July 2022 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 88.4%
Bradford-on-Avon July 2022 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 89.9%
Manchester March 2022 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.0%
Manchester March 2022 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 92.5%
November 2021 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 95.0%
November 2021 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 97.5%
November 2021 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 95.0%
Online April 2021 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.0%
Online April 2021 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 92.5%
Online April 2021 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 95.0%
Online April 2021 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 95.0%
Online September 2020 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 99.0%
Online September 2020 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 99.5%
Online September 2020 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 96.0%
Online September 2020 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 95.8%
Online August 2020 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 80.0%
Online August 2020 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 80.0%
Online August 2020 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 80.0%
Online June 2020 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.0%
Online June 2020 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.0%
Online June 2020 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.0%
Online June 2020 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.0%
Online June 2020 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 91.0%
Online June 2020 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 91.7%
Online June 2020 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 92.1%
Online June 2020 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 92.5%
Online June 2020 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 92.8%
Online June 2020 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 92.5%
Online June 2020 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 93.2%
Online June 2020 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 92.9%
Online June 2020 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 93.1%
Online June 2020 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 92.9%

Online 2020 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 92.7%

We asked our delegates what they would say to anyone thinking of attending this course:

"Superbly delivered and excellent content"

"I feel much more able to lead and take part in a productive hazard study now."

"I would tell others to attend this course."

"My knowledge has certainly improved I feel much more able to lead and take part in a productive HazOp study now."

"Perfect for a general overview of the HazOp process"

"well worth it easier for me than class room courses a good pace."

"My understanding of the different levels of hazard study has increase meetings. I would rate my knowledge after the training as GOOD."

"The course was very good."

"Will help solidify the fundamentals and improve the structure of your HazOps. "

"I would highly recommend this course to anyone wishing to be part of any Hazop study."

"David (trainer) was great, very inclusive"

"It has given me ideas on how to improve our processes"

"Dave knows his subject and how to share it in an understandable way"

"Overall the trainers were excellent."

"Highly recommend, made the process more clear"

"Exercises practicing to be chairing a course was very useful."

"I think it will be very useful for anyone involved in Hazops to attend this course, it gave a good overview & the tools to complete your own assessment successfully."

"Beneficial to anyone involved in H&RA, irrespective of whether they intend to lead a HazOp"

"Very worthwhile course if you are ever going to be involved in a HazOp"

"Worthwhile course for HazOp team members"

"Overall the learning experience was excellent."

"It was a very good refresher and updated my knowledge. "

"I am now confident i could lead [a HazOp] in the future"

"Very useful even if you have done a HazOp"

"The course was good and would be useful to any of the has waste site managers in the business."

"Excellent experience - a good improvement in skills and competence"

"Well delivered and good real life examples"

"I feel now that I understand the process it has helped me to identify gaps on my own site and now know how to resolve these."

"Useful for new and experienced leaders"

"Very informative course which goes into a good level of detail"

"Worthwhile and informative. "

"Should be mandatory prior to attending HazOps "

"The most important thing i learned was about scoring."

"...further knowledge gained regarding risk assessments and re-scoring based on safeguards"

"I would encourage others to attend this course"

"Very useful, especially if not familiar with HazOps"

"Trainers were very knowledgeable and explained the topics well, can't fault them"

"The trainer led the course very well, kept the course interesting and was open to discussion"

"I think it would be very useful for anyone involved in HazOps . It gave a good overview and the tools to complete your own assessment successfully."

"Good prep for leading HazOp"

"The trainers knowledge and understanding of the material was expert level."

"Go for it"

"Clearly very experienced facilitators with enthusiasm, good knowledge and able to draw on real life experience."

"Zero to hero! (only joking) but I do feel a lot more confident coming from absolutely no background knowledge to feeling like I have valuable points to contribute in a hazop"

"The real life examples gave comparison of real life to the theory which could be debated, which gave variety."

"Refreshed and Improved. "

"Good information and examples of carrying out HazOps"

"Thoroughly enjoyed the course (against expectations). Would like to get further involved in Hazard Studies."

"I will now be much better at recording actions and making reports more effective"

"Interactive materials as well as good used of videos. Excellent course from David, very approachable."

"I would now be comfortable chairing (with support)"

"Useful for hazard study leaders"

"Overall the course was excellent"

"It is useful"

"Definitely join the course, it gives you a good overview of what is needed to achieve a safe and efficient process if extensive hazard studies are completed and the life cycle steps followed."

"Enjoyed the practical exercises"

"I have learned how to contribute effectively in a HazID / HazOp"

"The course has enabled me to a have a clear understanding of the various stages applied and the level of detailed required to properly assess risk."

"Attend. Especially if you have Hazard Study experience."

"Highly recommended"

"The trainers struck a good balance between observing and providing some further guidance during the hazard study exercises. "

"Both David and Andy were great, really enjoyed the course and listening to their experiences in the real world!"

"Well paced and interactive"

"Excellent. Will recommend to colleagues."

"Very informative course, delivered well"

"Well worth attending, online was easier for me than class room courses a good pace."

"Brilliant course, do it."

"Trainers worked at a good pace, answering any questions, and kept it fun and interesting."

"I have learned the best practices available and and other peoples experiences of completing HazOp"

"Overall the trainer was excellent"

"Human Factors & Behaviors was invaluable"

"Allowed for good discussion between the group"

"Gained confidence in my ability to lead HazOp"

"Do it, you might learn something about yourself or about the best way to carry out a detailed study on some new equipment."

"Will give you real world exposure to the world of hazard studies. Very informative and will urge you to go and take a look at the Hazard Study in existence for your site."

"Very good for general overview and introduction to HazOps"

"Go on this course, it will help with all hazard studies"

"Excellent delivery and allowance for discussion"

"I have a much better understanding of the methodology behind a HazOp. "

"The real life examples - the hazop report and action forms was good as this gave comaprison of real life to the theory which could be debated, which again gave variety."

"The trainers knowledge was excellent."

"This was a very good refresher for me"

"I thought the trainer was very good and displayed good knowledge of the subject"

"A fresh perspective for anyone who leads studies"

"Good course for the consultant to obtain a substantial understanding the wider picture / interfaces to HazOp."

"You will take away a detailed knowledge as it is explained in a suitable way"

"Great course, especially info on how to deal with certain characters in a study workshop."

"Good with videos and discussions from a HazOp Perspective"

"Interesting learning. Will be useful for life"

"David is exceptionally good at sharing examples, demonstrating both good and poor practice."

"The information presented on this course has been incredibly ben beneficial for me."

Hazard Study Training Course Testimonials


Check your diary and reserve a place

Live Online Learning
Classroom Learning
-
SOLD OUT


E: support@methodprosafe.com. T: 44 (0)1462 713313. W: www.methodprosafe.com

Method Functional Safety

Functional Safety + Process Safety + Cyber Security + Compliance Assessment + Competency Register + Software Solutions = Method Safety and Security

Address: Method Process Safety Ltd. Method House, Davis Crescent, Hitchin, SG5 3RB
Phone: +44 (0)1462 713313 Email: support@methodprosafe.com Website:

Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy. Registered In England 11410637 | VAT No. GB 302 4333 56. Site © Copyright Method Process Safety Ltd 2025

LinkedinMethod Functional Safety member of InstMC