Method Process Safety
Venn Diagram - Is this in line with the requirements of 61511?

=Method Quiz Question 6 of 11.

The Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS) book “Layer of Protection Analysis – Simplified Process Risk Assessment” published by the American Institute of Chemical Engineers, is widely recognised as an authoritative text on LOPA (and is referenced both the IChemE and =Method LOPA training as a suitable text). CCPS Chapter 11 indicates that credit may be taken for two Basic Process Control System (BPCS) independent protection layers even if they share a common logic solver (PLC or DCS).

Is this in line with the requirements of 61511?


NO. The CCPS book argues that routing two BPCS protection layers (with different sensors and actuators) through the same PLC / DCS is permissible because the random hardware failure rate of the logic solver is insignificant when compared to the failure rates of the sensors and final elements (valves). However, IEC 61511 does not recognise these as independent protection layers – at best one x10 risk reduction credit could be taken. IEC 61511 even highlights that “hot standby” controllers cannot be used to justify independence. While CCPS only considers random hardware failure rates, the independence requirements established by IEC 61511 also consider the impact that human errors (systematic failures) could have on the logic solver, which experience shows have been significant contributors to faults.

Go to Q7 Start again

E: T: 44 (0)1462 713313. W:

Method Functional Safety

Functional Safety + Process Safety + Cyber Security + Compliance Assessment + Competency Register + Software Solutions = Method Safety and Security

Address: Method Process Safety Ltd. Method House, Davis Crescent, Hitchin, SG5 3RB
Phone: +44 (0)1462 713313 Email: Website:

Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy. Registered In England 11410637 | VAT No. GB 302 4333 56. Site © Copyright Method Process Safety Ltd 2024

LinkedinMethod Functional Safety member of InstMC