Method Process Safety
support@methodprosafe.com

Hazard Study Leaders Training Course Testimonials


Spread of delegate scores

70 70
75 75
80 80
85 85
90 90
95 95
100 100
0.0% rated
< 70%
2.0% rated
70 - 75%
4.0% rated
75 - 80%
0.0% rated
80 - 85%
6.0% rated
85 - 90%
20.0% rated
90 - 95%
68.0% rated
95 - 100%

Data taken from last 50 results (max').


Average delegate rating

Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 0.0%
Abingdon November 2025 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 100.0%
Abingdon November 2025 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 100.0%
Abingdon November 2025 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 99.7%
Abingdon November 2025 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 97.3%
Abingdon November 2025 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 93.4%
Abingdon November 2025 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 93.7%
Abingdon November 2025 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 94.6%
Doncaster July 2025 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 85.0%
Doncaster July 2025 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 92.5%
Doncaster July 2025 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 91.7%
Doncaster July 2025 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 93.8%
Doncaster July 2025 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 93.0%
Doncaster July 2025 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.0%
Doncaster July 2025 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 91.4%
Doncaster July 2025 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 91.3%
Doncaster July 2025 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 92.2%
London July 2025 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 100.0%
London July 2025 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 100.0%
London July 2025 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 98.3%
Glasgow January 2025 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 99.0%
Glasgow January 2025 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 99.5%
Glasgow January 2025 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 99.7%
Glasgow January 2025 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 99.8%
Glasgow January 2025 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 98.8%
Glasgow January 2025 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 98.2%
Glasgow January 2025 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 98.2%
September 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 100.0%
September 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 95.0%
September 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 95.0%
September 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 95.0%
September 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 95.3%
September 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 96.1%
June 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 100.0%
June 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 95.0%
June 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 93.3%
June 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 95.0%
June 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 93.0%
June 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 89.2%
June 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 89.3%
June 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 88.8%
Edinburgh May 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.0%
Edinburgh May 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 95.0%
Edinburgh May 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 96.7%
Edinburgh May 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 97.5%
Edinburgh May 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 98.0%
Edinburgh May 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 96.7%
March 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 100.0%
March 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 97.5%
March 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 98.3%
March 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 97.5%
March 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 97.0%
March 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 97.5%
March 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 97.9%
March 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 98.1%
Leeds December 2023 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.0%
Leeds December 2023 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 92.5%
Leeds December 2023 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.0%
Leeds December 2023 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.0%
Leeds December 2023 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 89.0%
Handforth July 2023 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.0%
Handforth July 2023 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 95.0%
Handforth July 2023 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 96.3%
Handforth July 2023 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 94.8%
Stockport November 2022 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.0%
Stockport November 2022 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.0%
Stockport November 2022 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 91.7%
Stockport November 2022 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 91.3%
Stockport November 2022 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 91.0%
Stockport November 2022 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.8%
Bradford-on-Avon July 2022 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 80.0%
Bradford-on-Avon July 2022 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 82.0%
Bradford-on-Avon July 2022 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 86.3%
Bradford-on-Avon July 2022 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 87.3%
Bradford-on-Avon July 2022 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 87.8%
Bradford-on-Avon July 2022 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 88.2%
Bradford-on-Avon July 2022 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 88.4%
Bradford-on-Avon July 2022 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 89.9%
Manchester March 2022 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.0%
Manchester March 2022 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 92.5%
November 2021 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 95.0%
November 2021 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 97.5%

We asked our delegates what they would say to anyone thinking of attending this course:

"Lots of hands on experience was very good and examples - so useful"

"Supportive and helped gain significant knowledge"

"Vastly improved knowledge"

"Very engaging and knowledgeable trainer"

"Significant improvements on knowledge of HazOp process"

"Very clear explanations of course material and ensured every was following."

"Good range of information and knowledge - now to put it into practice."

"Has really helped me understand the process in greater depth."

"Very good at teaching, listening and also explaining complex issues."

"Somehow they trainer managed to turn a really dense topic in 4 days of actually digestible and applicable information"

"I found the course content very easy to follow and informative, i feel like i have the tools now to participate and eventually lead "

"Shows the effectiveness of the course and David's teaching that HazOp beginners and experienced consultants were able to stay equally engaged."

"Worth the time for any role in Process Safety"

"Very engaging, loved the practical reinforcement."

"Highly worthwhile and would recommend"

"Gained lots of knowledge about what it takes to lead HazOps"

"The trainers experience and enthusiasm for the topic was very evident which enhances the quality of the course."

"Great course, especially info on how to deal with certain characters in a study workshop."

"I would now be comfortable chairing (with support)"

"I have learned the best practices available and and other peoples experiences of completing HazOp"

Hazard Study Workshop Testimonials

E: support@methodprosafe.com. T: 44 (0)1462 713313. W: www.methodprosafe.com

Address: Method Process Safety Ltd. Method House, Davis Crescent, Hitchin, SG5 3RB
Phone: +44 (0)1462 713313 Email: support@methodprosafe.com Website:

Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy. Registered In England 11410637 | VAT No. GB 302 4333 56. Site © Copyright Method Process Safety Ltd 2026