Method Process Safety
support@methodprosafe.com

Hazard Study Leaders Training Course Testimonials


Spread of delegate scores

70 70
75 75
80 80
85 85
90 90
95 95
100 100
0.0% rated
< 70%
3.1% rated
70 - 75%
0.0% rated
75 - 80%
0.0% rated
80 - 85%
12.5% rated
85 - 90%
43.8% rated
90 - 95%
40.6% rated
95 - 100%

Data taken from last 50 results (max').


Average delegate rating

Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 0.0%
Glasgow January 2025 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 99.0%
Glasgow January 2025 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 99.5%
Glasgow January 2025 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 99.7%
Glasgow January 2025 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 99.8%
Glasgow January 2025 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 98.8%
Glasgow January 2025 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 98.2%
Glasgow January 2025 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 98.2%
September 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 100.0%
September 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 95.0%
September 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 95.0%
September 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 95.0%
September 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 95.3%
September 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 96.1%
June 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 100.0%
June 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 95.0%
June 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 93.3%
June 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 95.0%
June 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 93.0%
June 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 89.2%
June 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 89.3%
June 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 88.8%
Edinburgh May 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.0%
Edinburgh May 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 95.0%
Edinburgh May 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 96.7%
Edinburgh May 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 97.5%
Edinburgh May 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 98.0%
Edinburgh May 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 96.7%
March 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 100.0%
March 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 97.5%
March 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 98.3%
March 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 97.5%
March 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 97.0%
March 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 97.5%
March 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 97.9%
March 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 98.1%
Leeds December 2023 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.0%
Leeds December 2023 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 92.5%
Leeds December 2023 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.0%
Leeds December 2023 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.0%
Leeds December 2023 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 89.0%
Handforth July 2023 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.0%
Handforth July 2023 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 95.0%
Handforth July 2023 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 96.3%
Handforth July 2023 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 94.8%
Stockport November 2022 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.0%
Stockport November 2022 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.0%
Stockport November 2022 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 91.7%
Stockport November 2022 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 91.3%
Stockport November 2022 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 91.0%
Stockport November 2022 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.8%
Bradford-on-Avon July 2022 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 80.0%
Bradford-on-Avon July 2022 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 82.0%
Bradford-on-Avon July 2022 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 86.3%
Bradford-on-Avon July 2022 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 87.3%
Bradford-on-Avon July 2022 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 87.8%
Bradford-on-Avon July 2022 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 88.2%
Bradford-on-Avon July 2022 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 88.4%
Bradford-on-Avon July 2022 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 89.9%
Manchester March 2022 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.0%
Manchester March 2022 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 92.5%
November 2021 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 95.0%
November 2021 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 97.5%

We asked our delegates what they would say to anyone thinking of attending this course:

"Well delivered and good real life examples"

"Highly recommended"

"I would encourage others to attend this course"

"Gained lots of knowledge about what it takes to lead HazOps"

"Excellent experience - a good improvement in skills and competence"

"It has given me ideas on how to improve our processes"

"The trainers knowledge and understanding of the material was expert level."

"...further knowledge gained regarding risk assessments and re-scoring based on safeguards"

"A fresh perspective for anyone who leads studies"

"The trainers experience and enthusiasm for the topic was very evident which enhances the quality of the course."

Hazard Study Workshop Testimonials

E: support@methodprosafe.com. T: 44 (0)1462 713313. W: www.methodprosafe.com

Method Functional Safety

Functional Safety + Process Safety + Cyber Security + Compliance Assessment + Competency Register + Software Solutions = Method Safety and Security

Address: Method Process Safety Ltd. Method House, Davis Crescent, Hitchin, SG5 3RB
Phone: +44 (0)1462 713313 Email: support@methodprosafe.com Website:

Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy. Registered In England 11410637 | VAT No. GB 302 4333 56. Copyright © 2025 Method Process Safety Ltd

LinkedinMethod Functional Safety member of InstMC