Method Process Safety
support@methodprosafe.com

Hazard Study Leaders Training Course Testimonials


Spread of delegate scores

70 70
75 75
80 80
85 85
90 90
95 95
100 100
0.0% rated
< 70%
3.1% rated
70 - 75%
0.0% rated
75 - 80%
0.0% rated
80 - 85%
12.5% rated
85 - 90%
43.8% rated
90 - 95%
40.6% rated
95 - 100%

Data taken from last 50 results (max').


Average delegate rating

Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 0.0%
Glasgow January 2025 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 99.0%
Glasgow January 2025 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 99.5%
Glasgow January 2025 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 99.7%
Glasgow January 2025 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 99.8%
Glasgow January 2025 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 98.8%
Glasgow January 2025 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 98.2%
Glasgow January 2025 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 98.2%
September 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 100.0%
September 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 95.0%
September 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 95.0%
September 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 95.0%
September 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 95.3%
September 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 96.1%
June 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 100.0%
June 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 95.0%
June 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 93.3%
June 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 95.0%
June 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 93.0%
June 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 89.2%
June 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 89.3%
June 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 88.8%
Edinburgh May 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.0%
Edinburgh May 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 95.0%
Edinburgh May 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 96.7%
Edinburgh May 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 97.5%
Edinburgh May 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 98.0%
Edinburgh May 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 96.7%
March 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 100.0%
March 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 97.5%
March 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 98.3%
March 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 97.5%
March 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 97.0%
March 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 97.5%
March 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 97.9%
March 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 98.1%
Leeds December 2023 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.0%
Leeds December 2023 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 92.5%
Leeds December 2023 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.0%
Leeds December 2023 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.0%
Leeds December 2023 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 89.0%
Handforth July 2023 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.0%
Handforth July 2023 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 95.0%
Handforth July 2023 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 96.3%
Handforth July 2023 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 94.8%
Stockport November 2022 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.0%
Stockport November 2022 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.0%
Stockport November 2022 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 91.7%
Stockport November 2022 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 91.3%
Stockport November 2022 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 91.0%
Stockport November 2022 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.8%
Bradford-on-Avon July 2022 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 80.0%
Bradford-on-Avon July 2022 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 82.0%
Bradford-on-Avon July 2022 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 86.3%
Bradford-on-Avon July 2022 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 87.3%
Bradford-on-Avon July 2022 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 87.8%
Bradford-on-Avon July 2022 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 88.2%
Bradford-on-Avon July 2022 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 88.4%
Bradford-on-Avon July 2022 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 89.9%
Manchester March 2022 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.0%
Manchester March 2022 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 92.5%
November 2021 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 95.0%
November 2021 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 97.5%

We asked our delegates what they would say to anyone thinking of attending this course:

"The information presented on this course has been incredibly beneficial for me."

"Allowed for good discussion between the group"

"Highly recommend, made the process more clear"

"Refreshed and Improved. "

"I am now confident i could lead [a HazOp] in the future"

"Very useful even if you have done a HazOp"

"Will help solidify the fundamentals and improve the structure of your HazOps. "

"Excellent delivery and allowance for discussion"

"Good course for the consultant to obtain a substantial understanding the wider picture / interfaces to HazOp."

"Very informative course which goes into a good level of detail"

Hazard Study Workshop Testimonials

E: support@methodprosafe.com. T: 44 (0)1462 713313. W: www.methodprosafe.com

Method Functional Safety

Functional Safety + Process Safety + Cyber Security + Compliance Assessment + Competency Register + Software Solutions = Method Safety and Security

Address: Method Process Safety Ltd. Method House, Davis Crescent, Hitchin, SG5 3RB
Phone: +44 (0)1462 713313 Email: support@methodprosafe.com Website:

Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy. Registered In England 11410637 | VAT No. GB 302 4333 56. Site © Copyright Method Process Safety Ltd 2025

LinkedinMethod Functional Safety member of InstMC