A hazard study 2 (HazID) aims to identify the main process safety hazards in the process and ensures that appropriate safeguards have been put in place. It asks questions like:
The main difference between HS2 and HazOp (HS3) is that HS2 uses a “top-down” approach, whereas HazOp uses a “bottom-up” approach. HS2 also requires less detailed design information than HS3, and takes less time to do. Carrying out a HS2 saves time and money for the project by hopefully identifying any serious issues before the design has progressed too far. To get the best value from HS2, it should be carried out once process flow diagrams (PFDs) are available, but before full piping & instrumentation diagrams (P&IDs) have been produced. Sufficient time should be allowed in the project program to allow actions raised at HS2 to be completed before the design is frozen for HazOp.
HS2 of new chemical process. Facilitator and author of study report.
Industry: ChemicalRisk assessment of Burner Management System using Fault Tree Analysis.
Industry: Mining / Metal / CementHazID of defence industry fuel storage system
Industry: Military / AviationAuthor of Safety Plan for HazID of Ink Manufacturing process
Industry: ChemicalYou can contact =Method below:
p: +44 (0)1462 713313
E: support@methodprosafe.com. T: 44 (0)1462 713313. W: www.methodprosafe.com